For attorney-led title work
The examiner workspace built for attorney-led title work.
The attorney is the decision-maker. We accelerate the search, the exception review, and the examination package — without taking the human out of the loop on the judgment calls that matter.
AI assists the examiner. The attorney remains the decision-maker. TitleTools does not certify title — that is the practice of law.
app.titletools.io · examiner workspace
Why this exists
Attorney-led title work has its own shape.
The volume software being sold to title companies was not built around the attorney workflow. Four specifics worth being explicit about.
The attorney is the certifier — the AI is not.
In attorney-led title work, your firm runs the search and signs the opinion. AI is built to compress the rote work — classifying documents, surfacing exceptions, parsing legal descriptions — never to certify title.
Volume software was not built around your workflow.
The platforms sold to large title-plant operations and high-volume escrow shops assume a closing-management workflow. Different intake, different sign-off, different economics. Examiners in attorney-led firms inherit the wrong tools and adapt around them.
Recording and court records vary by county, not by state.
Different indexing systems, different formats, different completeness — even between neighboring counties. Statewide court portals are catching up, but legacy data is rough. We aggregate across that variability so the examiner does not have to.
Small and mid-size firms are underserved.
High-volume tooling is priced for national operations. Solo and three-to-four-attorney firms — thousands of them — are doing this work largely by hand. We build for the firms in the middle.
The examiner workflow
Four steps. The human stays in the loop on every one.
This is the work attorneys and paralegals are doing today on paper or in five different tabs. TitleTools puts it in one workspace with the AI doing the rote work and the examiner doing the judgment work.
Step 1 · Intake
Drop the package in — any format.
PDFs, image bundles, mixed sets. Pages are split, OCR'd, and each one is classified into the right document type before the examiner opens a single file.
Step 2 · Examine
Findings surface alongside the document.
Grantors, grantees, dates, legal descriptions, name variations, marital-status inconsistencies, covenants — every finding is pinned to a source page and bounding box.
Step 3 · Verify
You decide. Every time.
Accept, edit, or reject every AI-generated finding. Add your own exceptions. The attorney signs off on the opinion — nothing leaves the queue otherwise.
Step 4 · Assemble
Examination package on the way out.
Reorder, rotate, hide, and insert pages. Drop in the opinion letter, the exception schedule, and the source documents that back them. Export a single indexed PDF as the deliverable to the firm — or to opposing counsel, the underwriter, or the closing attorney.
Who this is built for
Built for the firms the big platforms forgot.
Small and mid-sized attorney-led firms, sole-practitioner real-estate lawyers, regional title companies, and county-level indexing operations. The shops where the examiner doing the work is also the partner who signs the opinion.
- ·You're already paying for a closing-management platform — or you've decided not to — and you still don't have a tool that actually does the examination work.
- ·You want a tool that sits beside your existing closing software, not a vertical-integration play that wants to swallow the whole closing pipeline.
- ·Your client documents and your client list stay scoped to your firm — encrypted, US-hosted, and never used to train shared AI models.
Who this is not built for
We're not trying to be the big platforms.
SoftPro, Qualia, RamQuest, ClosingSimple — those are closing-management platforms. They run the closing pipeline: ledger, parties, settlement statement, post-close. They're well-built for that, and we are intentionally not trying to compete with them.
TitleTools is the examination piece — the title search, the document processing, the exception schedule, the opinion. Pair it with your closing software, or run it standalone if your closing process lives elsewhere. Either way, the title work is what we do — well — and we don't try to do everything else.
Under the hood
What the platform actually does.
Ingest the package, however it arrives.
PDF stacks, image bundles, mixed file types — drop them in. Pages are split, OCR’d, and classified by document type (deed, deed of trust, satisfaction, tax statement, plat, exception). Bounding boxes are kept so every extracted field traces back to the source.
Surface findings the examiner can act on.
Generated exceptions and findings appear with the underlying citation: marital-status inconsistencies, name variations across documents, recorded covenants, missing acknowledgements. The examiner reviews, edits, accepts, or rejects — nothing leaves the queue without human sign-off.
Cross-check the legal description against the parcel.
Metes-and-bounds and lot-block descriptions are parsed and overlaid on the assessor parcel map. Closure errors, missing calls, and parcel mismatches show up visually instead of forcing a hand-trace on graph paper.
Assemble the examination package on the way out.
Reorder, rotate, hide, and insert pages. Pull in cover sheets and exception lists. Export a single PDF or send for attorney review — the package that used to be a paper-and-staples job lands as a finished, indexed document set.
North Carolina firms
Looking for North Carolina specifics?
NC is our most populated state today — all 100 counties live, parcel data loaded statewide. If you're an NC firm and want the county-level coverage detail or the specifics on how we handle NC's recording-office variability, we've got a separate page for that.
The boring trust stuff
Where the data lives. Who can see it. How we behave when it matters.
AI tools in real estate sit on top of confidential documents and reportable transactions. These are the commitments behind the product, not buried in a terms-of-service somewhere.
The attorney is the decision-maker.
TitleTools generates suggestions, citations, and confidence levels. You approve them. We do not certify title — that is the practice of law, and the AI is not licensed to do it.
Your data is your data.
Documents you upload are scoped to your firm, encrypted in transit and at rest, US-hosted on enterprise cloud infrastructure, and never used to train shared AI models. We will share our security documentation and sign a data-use agreement before any engagement.
Every output is auditable.
Bounding boxes, source pages, and confidence levels surface with every extracted field and every generated exception. You can see why the system said what it said — and so can the bar, if it ever asks.
Built for title, not bolted on.
We use industry-tuned pipelines for OCR, classification, and field extraction — not a generic chatbot pointed at the internet. Limelyte has been building software in this market since 1999; we co-engineered PropertySync, which runs production title plants with billions of records.
Frequently asked
Questions we hear from attorneys.
- What states do you support today?
- We work with state and county governments across the country to source authoritative parcel and recording data. The /states pages on this site are landing pages we have stood up for specific state bars and attorney associations — they are not the limit of our footprint. If your state is not listed, email hello@limelyte.com and we will prioritize.
- Where does my data live and who can see it?
- Data is stored on enterprise cloud infrastructure in the United States. Documents are scoped to your firm. They are not shared with other tenants and are not used to train any AI model. We can provide our security posture documentation on request.
- What AI models do you use? Are they explainable?
- We use a mix of industry-tuned OCR for layout and field extraction, and large language models for higher-level reasoning — selected and tuned for the document type. Every output is paired with the source page and bounding box that drove it, so the examiner can verify rather than trust blindly.
- What document types are supported?
- Recording documents (deeds, deeds of trust, releases, satisfactions, easements, plats), tax and assessor documents, and an extensible pipeline that can be tuned to whatever document patterns your county or workflow uses.
- What about OFAC, FIRPTA, and bankruptcy checks?
- OFAC screening, FIRPTA determination, and bankruptcy search are part of the examination workflow. PACER access for bankruptcy is included rather than priced as an add-on. If FinCEN’s residential real estate reporting rule returns, we will add it.
Who we are
Built by Limelyte. In title software since the mid-2010s.
TitleTools is built by Limelyte Technology Group, a software company founded in 1999. We have been building in the title industry since the mid-2010s, when we co-engineered PropertySync — the title-plant platform that today runs production plants for some of the largest counties in the country, with billions of indexed records.We integrate with state and county governments across the country to bring authoritative parcel and recording data into title workflows. The state pages on this site are landing pages for specific state bars and attorney associations. If you operate somewhere we have not listed, tell us — we likely already have your data.
See it on a file
See it on a real file.
Walk us through what your examination workflow looks like today and we'll walk you through what it would look like in TitleTools — on a real property, with your counties loaded.
Or email hello@limelyte.com directly.